On 09/15/2017 04:48 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Without this we'd pick an unrolling factor based purely on longs,
> ignoring the ints. It's posssible that vect_get_smallest_scalar_type
> should also handle shifts, but I think we'd still want this as a
> belt-and-braces fix.
>
> Tested on aarch
Without this we'd pick an unrolling factor based purely on longs,
ignoring the ints. It's posssible that vect_get_smallest_scalar_type
should also handle shifts, but I think we'd still want this as a
belt-and-braces fix.
Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu.
OK
