On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/26/11 11:43, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> Looks good to me apart from not using gsi_start_nondebug_bb in
>>> thread_around_empty_block.
> Ah. I wasn't aware of gsi_start_nondebug_bb. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/26/11 11:43, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me apart from not using gsi_start_nondebug_bb in
>> thread_around_empty_block.
Ah. I wasn't aware of gsi_start_nondebug_bb. I updated the patch to
use it, ran another bootstrap and regres
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I've been doing some research into improving certain aspects of our
> warnings, particularly removing false positives from the warnings which
> require dataflow information. I think it's reasona
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been doing some research into improving certain aspects of our
warnings, particularly removing false positives from the warnings which
require dataflow information. I think it's reasonably well known that
many of the false positives occur due to
