On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:33:21PM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> I think its time to remove `XPASS' from corresponding tests.
> On 03 Jan 22:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:58:30PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> > > I don't doubt that would work, what I'm interested
Hello,
I think its time to remove `XPASS' from corresponding tests.
On 03 Jan 22:11, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:58:30PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> > I don't doubt that would work, what I'm interested in, is (cat verintlin.f):
>
> Well, you need gather loads for that
On 01/03/2014 10:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:58:30PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
I don't doubt that would work, what I'm interested in, is (cat verintlin.f):
Well, you need gather loads for that and there you hit PR target/59617.
I tried your patch, and the effe
Hi!
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:58:30PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> I don't doubt that would work, what I'm interested in, is (cat verintlin.f):
Well, you need gather loads for that and there you hit PR target/59617.
Completely untested patch that let's your testcase be vectorized
using 64-byte ve
