On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:28:52AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:56:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > --- gcc/cgraph.h(revision 259668)
> > +++ gcc/cgraph.h(working copy)
> > @@ -,7 +,7 @@ public:
> >void dump (FILE *f);
> >
> >/* Dump
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:56:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> --- gcc/cgraph.h(revision 259668)
> +++ gcc/cgraph.h(working copy)
> @@ -,7 +,7 @@ public:
>void dump (FILE *f);
>
>/* Dump symbol table to stderr. */
> - inline DEBUG_FUNCTION void debug (void)
> +
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:56:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:40 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > Jakub and Richi,
> >
> > GCC 8.1 is experiencing the same bootstrap failure with GCC 8.1 RC1 as
> > we saw previously.
> >
> > Bootstrap comparison failure!
> > gcc/function
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:40 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Jakub and Richi,
>
> GCC 8.1 is experiencing the same bootstrap failure with GCC 8.1 RC1 as
> we saw previously.
>
> Bootstrap comparison failure!
> gcc/function-tests.o differs
>
> And the same reason: unique, static symbol that includes a
Jakub and Richi,
GCC 8.1 is experiencing the same bootstrap failure with GCC 8.1 RC1 as
we saw previously.
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/function-tests.o differs
And the same reason: unique, static symbol that includes a random timestamp.
1949c1949
< [1936]m 0x0060 1
