On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:23:36PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > Status
> > ==
> >
> > The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
> > which I will do tomorrow if no serious issue shows up until then.
> > The branch is fro
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:23:36PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
> which I will do tomorrow if no serious issue shows up until then.
> The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
> u
On 4/3/2013 8:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Joel Sherrill wrote:
The RTEMS Community would like to squeeze pr56771 in. It only got a fix in the
past few days. It is a one line arm-rtems specific path to libcpp configure.
Can I commit that?
Sure, if it got RTEMS maintainer
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> The RTEMS Community would like to squeeze pr56771 in. It only got a fix in
> the past few days. It is a one line arm-rtems specific path to libcpp
> configure.
>
> Can I commit that?
Sure, if it got RTEMS maintainer approval.
Richard.
> --joel
> RTE
The RTEMS Community would like to squeeze pr56771 in. It only got a fix in the
past few days. It is a one line arm-rtems specific path to libcpp configure.
Can I commit that?
--joel
RTEMS
Richard Biener wrote:
Status
==
The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
wh
Status
==
The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
which I will do tomorrow if no serious issue shows up until then.
The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
until the final release of GCC 4.7.3 which should happen roughly
one week after t
