> Agreed. Things would have been different twenty years ago, but these
> days using linker is a lot more natural and common (as a grep in gcc/doc
> confirms, too).
Even 20 years ago, I think "linker" would have been the more natural
word. I remember "linker" from my IBM days in the early 80's.
On Fri, 6 May 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> I would propose to clarify as:
>>
>> "To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (or the GNU linker),"
> I see no harm in that change, Gerald, what do you think?
Agreed. Things would have been different twenty years ago, but these
days using linker is
