On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
> Two test cases, debug_msg_so.err and debug_msg_ndebug.err, are still
> broken by the original patch, because (a) debug_msg.so has a DT_NEEDED
> entry for libstdc++.so, (b) the use of -static-libstdc++ means that
> that DT_NEEDED entry is unkno
Two test cases, debug_msg_so.err and debug_msg_ndebug.err, are still
broken by the original patch, because (a) debug_msg.so has a DT_NEEDED
entry for libstdc++.so, (b) the use of -static-libstdc++ means that
that DT_NEEDED entry is unknown when we link the executable, and (c)
the undefined symbols
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> 2012-10-23 Eric Botcazou
>
> PR bootstrap/54820
> * configure.ac (have_static_libs): Force 'no' for GCC version < 4.5.
> * configure: Regenerate.
This is OK.
Thanks.
Ian
As reported by Ian and Peter in the audit trail, the check I added to detect
whether -static-libstdc++ is supported by g++ doesn't work because the option
is silently rejected by versions prior to 4.5.
The attached patch forces an error for these versions so as to make the check
always fail. T
