Re: *ping* - Re: Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-03-05 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > OK, though for the libiberty patch it would be good if someone can find > > the make-obstacks-texi.sh script referred to in libiberty.texi, check it > > in and get obstacks.texi exactly in sync with the output of that script > >

Re: *ping* - Re: Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-03-01 Thread Tobias Burnus
Joseph S. Myers wrote: OK, though for the libiberty patch it would be good if someone can find the make-obstacks-texi.sh script referred to in libiberty.texi, check it in and get obstacks.texi exactly in sync with the output of that script run on current glibc sources. I couldn't find it, but I

Re: *ping* - Re: Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-03-01 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg01106.html OK, though for the libiberty patch it would be good if someone can find the make-obstacks-texi.sh script referred to in libiberty.texi, check it in and get obstacks.texi exactly in sync with the o

*ping* - Re: Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-03-01 Thread Tobias Burnus
* PING * – The patch is rather simple and on the verge to be obvious. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-02/msg01106.html Tobias Tobias Burnus wrote: (The attachment contains my original patch (simple rediff) and Andreas' follow-up patch for libiberty.) Tobias Tobias Burnus wrote: This

Re: Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-02-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
* PING * (The attachment contains my original patch (simple rediff) and Andreas' follow-up patch for libiberty.) Tobias Tobias Burnus wrote: This is a follow up to Jakub's patch. With texinfo 5.0 one gets a bunch of warnings. This patch reduces the number of warnings – but there are still

Re: Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-02-21 Thread Andreas Schwab
Tobias Burnus writes: > PS: I tried the following libiberty patch; it fixes a warning with texinfo > 5.0. But I do not include it as it fails for some reason with an error > with texinfo 4.13: > ../../libiberty/libiberty.texi:250: Prev field of node `Functions' not > pointed to. > ../../libiberty

Fix some texinfo 5.0 warnings in gcc/doc + libiberty

2013-02-21 Thread Tobias Burnus
This is a follow up to Jakub's patch. With texinfo 5.0 one gets a bunch of warnings. This patch reduces the number of warnings – but there are still warnings to be fixed. This patch solves most of the issues related to mismatches between the item order in the @menu and the actual @nodes. As a