Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

On 11-02-15 10:22, Dominique d'Humières wrote: Le 10 févr. 2015 à 12:42, Tom de Vries a écrit : I think we need to understand first what's going on. Sure, my patch was mainly to silence the failures on my working tree. In both test-cases, on Linux with -fpic the inlining of one funct ion

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

> Le 10 févr. 2015 à 12:42, Tom de Vries a écrit : > > I think we need to understand first what's going on. Sure, my patch was mainly to silence the failures on my working tree. > In both test-cases, on Linux with -fpic the inlining of one function into the > other is not done, because we can

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

Tom, At -m32 on x86_64-apple-darwin14, the failing test case executes... % /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150209/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-19.c -fno-diagnostics

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

On 09-02-15 20:01, Dominique d'Humières wrote: Le 9 févr. 2015 à 19:10, Tom de Vries mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com>> a écrit : On 09-02-15 18:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: Tom, After these changes I have the following regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (tes

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

Also, aren't we pretty much the only target to default to PIC? So if the 'target' and 'nonpic' testing is failing when used in the context of dg-warning, wouldn't that appear functional on the nonpic targets? That is, since the nonpic test is to check for __PIC__, if that fails in dg-warning, woul

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

This appears to be the first instance where 'target' and 'nonpic' have been used in a dg-warning. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > >> Le 9 févr. 2015 à 20:01, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : >> >> >>> Le 9 févr. 2015 à 19:10, Tom de Vries a écrit : >>> >>> On 09-02-1

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

> Le 9 févr. 2015 à 20:01, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : > > >> Le 9 févr. 2015 à 19:10, Tom de Vries a écrit : >> >> On 09-02-15 18:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >>> Tom, >>> >>> After these changes I have the following regressions on >>> x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*: >>> >>> FAIL: gcc.dg/

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

On 09-02-15 18:23, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: Tom, After these changes I have the following regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for warnings, line 22) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times gr

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR64764 && Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

Tom, After these changes I have the following regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin1[04]*: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for warnings, line 22) FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of SCoPs: 0" 1 I can prepare an

Re: Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > I've observed a FAILURE for gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c with fpic: > ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of > SCoPs: 0" 2 > ... > > In the nonpic case, d_growable_string_resize is inlined into > d_

Fix scan-tree-dump for scop-19.c

Hi, I've observed a FAILURE for gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c with fpic: ... FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/scop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times graphite "number of SCoPs: 0" 2 ... In the nonpic case, d_growable_string_resize is inlined into d_growable_string_append_buffer, and we have 2 functions with a loop, w