On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> We previously stored the number of loop iterations rather
>>> than the number of latch iterations.
>>
>> So ->nb_iterations was unused without SV
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> We previously stored the number of loop iterations rather
>> than the number of latch iterations.
>
> So ->nb_iterations was unused without SVE? Otherwise can you please
> add a testcase?
TBH I can't remembe
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> We previously stored the number of loop iterations rather
> than the number of latch iterations.
So ->nb_iterations was unused without SVE? Otherwise can you please
add a testcase?
Thanks,
Richard.
> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x8
We previously stored the number of loop iterations rather
than the number of latch iterations.
Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
Richard
[ This patch is part of the SVE series posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-11/msg00030.html ]
gcc/
2016-11
