Hi,
Christophe Lyon wrote 2020-03-27 19:53:
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 11:56, Roman Zhuykov via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Hi all!
12.03.2020 6:17, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
>> perspective.
>>
>> But right now I see that when I enab
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 11:56, Roman Zhuykov via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> 12.03.2020 6:17, Jeff Law wrote:
> >> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
> >> perspective.
> >>
> >> But right now I see that when I enable -fmodulo-sched by default,
> >
Hi all!
12.03.2020 6:17, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
>> perspective.
>>
>> But right now I see that when I enable -fmodulo-sched by default, powerpc64le
>> bootstrap give comparison failure as of r10-7056.
>>
>> Comparing stages 2 and
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 19:39 +0300, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
> perspective.
>
> I found that few years ago, the most simple example is pr42631.c which fails
> (with just -fmodulo-sched or together with -fmodulo-sched-al
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
> perspective.
>
> I found that few years ago, the most simple example is pr42631.c which fails
> (with just -fmodulo-sched or together with -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmove
Hi!
Current modulo-sched implementation is a bit faulty from -fcompile-debug
perspective.
I found that few years ago, the most simple example is pr42631.c which fails
(with just -fmodulo-sched or together with -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves) on
powerpc64le with at least any gcc-4.9 or newer com
