Hi,
> Based on this opinion, the patch is OK for mainline, if there are no
...
Checked in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-10/msg00187.html
K
We also plan to test these changes along with LRA
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>>> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
>>> scheduler in gcc
>>> for x86 target (there several reported
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
>> scheduler in gcc
>> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>>
>> Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user a possibility to
Ping.
2012/9/18 Yuri Rumyantsev :
> Hi All,
>
> Forgot to attch the patch.
>
> 2012/9/18 Yuri Rumyantsev :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
>> scheduler in gcc
>> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>>
>> Ma
Hello!
> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
> scheduler in gcc
> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>
> Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user a possibility to
> safely turn on first scheduler for his codes. In
Hi All,
Forgot to attch the patch.
2012/9/18 Yuri Rumyantsev :
> Hi All,
>
> This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
> scheduler in gcc
> for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
>
> Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user
Hi All,
This patch aims to fix all stability issues related to using the first
scheduler in gcc
for x86 target (there several reported issues related to this problem).
Main idea of this activity is mostly to provide user a possibility to
safely turn on first scheduler for his codes. In some cases
