On 08/29/2017 09:09 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:42:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Does the attached (untested) patch work for you?
>
> Works for the cases I care about, yes.
Thanks. Here's what I'm committing after the usual bootstrap &
regression testing cycle on
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:42:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> Does the attached (untested) patch work for you?
Works for the cases I care about, yes.
Joerg
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:42:53AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/17/2017 08:35 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Hello,
> > attached patch fixes inconsistent handling of section flags when using
> > the section attribute, i.e.:
> >
> > __attribute__((section("writable1"))) int foo1;
> > __attribu
On 07/17/2017 08:35 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Hello,
> attached patch fixes inconsistent handling of section flags when using
> the section attribute, i.e.:
>
> __attribute__((section("writable1"))) int foo1;
> __attribute__((section("readonly1"))) const int foo1c;
> __attribute__((section("
ping
One more patch needed for another edge condition.
Joerg
Index: src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/varasm.c
diff -u src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/varasm.c:1.2
src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/varasm.c:1.3
--- src/external/gpl3/gcc/dist/gcc/varasm.c:1.2 Mon Jul 17 19:53:10 2017
+++ src/external/gpl3/gcc
Hello,
attached patch fixes inconsistent handling of section flags when using
the section attribute, i.e.:
__attribute__((section("writable1"))) int foo1;
__attribute__((section("readonly1"))) const int foo1c;
__attribute__((section("writable2"))) int foo2 = 42;
__attribute__((section("readonly2")
