Re: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure, revisited.

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 01:02:34 +0200 PR rtl-optimization/53176 > * rtlanal.c (rtx_cost): Adjust default cost for X with a > UNITS_PER_WORD factor for all X according to the size of > its mode, not just for SUBREGs with untieable modes. >

Re: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure, revisited.

Hans-Peter Nilsson writes: >> From: Richard Sandiford >> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:14:49 +0200 > >> Hans-Peter Nilsson writes: >> >> From: Richard Sandiford >> >> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:46:38 +0200 >> > >> >> To repeat: as things stand, very few targets define proper rtx costs >> >> for SET. >

Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure, revisited.

> From: Richard Sandiford > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:14:49 +0200 > Hans-Peter Nilsson writes: > >> From: Richard Sandiford > >> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:46:38 +0200 > > > >> To repeat: as things stand, very few targets define proper rtx costs > >> for SET. > > > > IMHO it's wrong to start blami

ping*4: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure (was: [C Patch]: pr52543)

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 04:49:27 +0200 > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 06:41:58 +0200 > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > > Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:24:41 +0200 > > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > > > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:02:25 +0200 > >

ping*3: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure (was: [C Patch]: pr52543)

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 06:41:58 +0200 > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:24:41 +0200 > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:02:25 +0200 > > > > Ping. I missed the PR number decoration on the ChangeLog entry: > > > >

ping*2: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure (was: [C Patch]: pr52543)

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 08:24:41 +0200 > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:02:25 +0200 > > Ping. I missed the PR number decoration on the ChangeLog entry: > > PR rtl-optimization/53176 > > * rtlanal.c (rtx_cost): Adjust default cost

ping: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure (was: [C Patch]: pr52543)

> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:02:25 +0200 Ping. I missed the PR number decoration on the ChangeLog entry: PR rtl-optimization/53176 > * rtlanal.c (rtx_cost): Adjust default cost for X with a > UNITS_PER_WORD factor for all X according to the size of >

Re: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure

> From: Richard Sandiford > Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:14:49 +0200 > Hans-Peter Nilsson writes: > >> From: Richard Sandiford > >> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:46:38 +0200 > > > >> To repeat: as things stand, very few targets define proper rtx costs > >> for SET. > > > > IMHO it's wrong to start blami

Re: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure

Hans-Peter Nilsson writes: >> From: Richard Sandiford >> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:46:38 +0200 > >> To repeat: as things stand, very few targets define proper rtx costs >> for SET. > > IMHO it's wrong to start blaming targets when rtx_cost doesn't > take the mode in account in the first place, for

Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure (was: [C Patch]: pr52543)

> From: Richard Sandiford > Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:46:38 +0200 > To repeat: as things stand, very few targets define proper rtx costs > for SET. IMHO it's wrong to start blaming targets when rtx_cost doesn't take the mode in account in the first place, for the default cost. (Well, except for

[PATCH, testsuite]: Fix gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c failure

Hello! 2012-02-14 Uros Bizjak * gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c: Fix and simplify target selector. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {,-m32}, committed to mainline SVN. Uros. Index: gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c === --- gcc.dg/lower-subre