On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
wrote:
> All cross-builds are "still" done as C. In C++ you don't need
> the missing struct qualifier or the typedef in "typedef struct
> gfc_expr ... gfc_expr;" (the struct declaration suffices) as
> there's no separate struct namespace IIUC.
>
All cross-builds are "still" done as C. In C++ you don't need
the missing struct qualifier or the typedef in "typedef struct
gfc_expr ... gfc_expr;" (the struct declaration suffices) as
there's no separate struct namespace IIUC.
Doesn't this show a bug in the compatibility warning system, or
is t
