On 02/18/2016 12:22 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
FWIW, I'm seeing the new test failing on the 4.9 branch:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:2:8: error: struct has no members [-Wpedantic]
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:9:8: error: ISO C fo
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> FWIW, I'm seeing the new test failing on the 4.9 branch:
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:2:8: error: struct has no members [-Wpedantic]
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:9:8: error: ISO C forbids empty
> initializer braces [-Wpedant
On 16 February 2016 at 16:37, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 07:21 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On 02/08/2016 05:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/29/2016 04:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
c/
PR c/69522
* c-parser.c (c_parser_braced_init): New arg outer_obstack. All
On 02/16/2016 07:21 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 02/08/2016 05:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/29/2016 04:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
c/
PR c/69522
* c-parser.c (c_parser_braced_init): New arg outer_obstack. All
callers changed. If nested_p is true, use it to call
finish_implicit_
On 02/08/2016 05:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/29/2016 04:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
c/
PR c/69522
* c-parser.c (c_parser_braced_init): New arg outer_obstack. All
callers changed. If nested_p is true, use it to call
finish_implicit_inits.
* c-tree.h (finish_implicit_inits):
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 02/12/2016 02:26 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>FAIL: gcc.dg/pr69522.c (test for excess errors)
> >>Excess errors:
> >>/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160212/gcc/testsuite/gc
On 02/12/2016 02:26 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr69522.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160212/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:2:8: error:
struct has no members [-Wpedantic]
/daten/aranym/
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr69522.c (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160212/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:2:8: error:
> struct has no members [-Wpedantic]
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160212/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr69522.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160212/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:2:8: error:
struct has no members [-Wpedantic]
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160212/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69522.c:9:8: error: ISO C
forbids empty initializer braces [-Wpedantic]
On 01/29/2016 04:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Let's say we have
struct a {
int x[1];
int y[1];
} x = { 0, { 0 } };
^
When we reach the marked brace, we call into push_init_level, where we
notice that we have implicit initializers (for x[]) lying around that we
should deal with no
Ping.
On 01/29/2016 12:40 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Let's say we have
struct a {
int x[1];
int y[1];
} x = { 0, { 0 } };
^
When we reach the marked brace, we call into push_init_level, where we
notice that we have implicit initializers (for x[]) lying around that we
should deal
Let's say we have
struct a {
int x[1];
int y[1];
} x = { 0, { 0 } };
^
When we reach the marked brace, we call into push_init_level, where we
notice that we have implicit initializers (for x[]) lying around that we
should deal with now that we've seen another open brace. The probl
12 matches
Mail list logo
