Re: Fix bootstrap on non-ifunc capable targets (i386)

2012-11-14 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 14.11.12 11:51, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > >> this commit: 193486 broke bootstrap on targets which do not have >> HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION. >> Ok to commit? > > OK, with appropriate ChangeLog entry and if bootstrapped correctly on > both, IFUNC and non-IFUNC capable target. Ok, below the

Re: Fix bootstrap on non-ifunc capable targets (i386)

2012-11-14 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > this commit: 193486 broke bootstrap on targets which do not have > HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION. > Ok to commit? OK, with appropriate ChangeLog entry and if bootstrapped correctly on both, IFUNC and non-IFUNC capable target. Thanks, Uros.

Fix bootstrap on non-ifunc capable targets (i386)

2012-11-14 Thread Andreas Tobler
Hi all, this commit: 193486 broke bootstrap on targets which do not have HAVE_GNU_INDIRECT_FUNCTION. Ok to commit? TIA, Andreas Index: config/i386/i386.c === --- config/i386/i386.c (revision 193495) +++ config/i386/i386.c (workin