On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> > OTOH it's a nice invariant that can actually be checked for (that all
>> > reachable vars whatsoever have to be in referenced_vars), so I'm going
>> > to do that.
>>
>> Yes, until we ge
Hi,
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > OTOH it's a nice invariant that can actually be checked for (that all
> > reachable vars whatsoever have to be in referenced_vars), so I'm going
> > to do that.
>
> Yes, until we get rid of referenced_vars (which we still should do at
> some
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> >> As I feared the call to get_var_ann in set_is_used right now really
>> >> is still needed, privatizing it hence isn't that straight forward.
>> >
>> > After pondering I concluded that
Hi,
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> As I feared the call to get_var_ann in set_is_used right now really
> >> is still needed, privatizing it hence isn't that straight forward.
> >
> > After pondering I concluded that it's not necessary to call
> > set_is_used for variables with
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
>
>> > > Ok. Time to make get_var_ann private?
>>
>> As I feared the call to get_var_ann in set_is_used right now really is
>> still needed, privatizing it hence isn't that straight forward.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> > > Currently regstrapping on x86_64-linux (without Ada). Okay for trunk?
>> >
>> > Ok. Time to make get_var_ann private?
>>
>> Y
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> > > Ok. Time to make get_var_ann private?
>
> As I feared the call to get_var_ann in set_is_used right now really is
> still needed, privatizing it hence isn't that straight forward.
After pondering I concluded that it's not necessary to call set_
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > > Currently regstrapping on x86_64-linux (without Ada). Okay for trunk?
> >
> > Ok. Time to make get_var_ann private?
>
> Yes. Should the regstrap succeed on x86_64-linux I'll commit thi
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Currently regstrapping on x86_64-linux (without Ada). Okay for trunk?
>
> Ok. Time to make get_var_ann private?
Yes. Should the regstrap succeed on x86_64-linux I'll commit this
variant of the patch (hunks in tree-flow.h, tree-flow-inline.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the last change in ipa-split generated a new use of a previously unused
> PARM_DECL. When one does this one has to call add_referenced_var. Not
> doing so can cause segfault when accessing the (not initialized) var
> annotation. So,
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:41:15PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the last change in ipa-split generated a new use of a previously unused
> PARM_DECL. When one does this one has to call add_referenced_var. Not
> doing so can cause segfault when accessing the (not initialized) var
>
Hi,
the last change in ipa-split generated a new use of a previously unused
PARM_DECL. When one does this one has to call add_referenced_var. Not
doing so can cause segfault when accessing the (not initialized) var
annotation. So, fixed with the patch.
I took the opportunity to remove all e
12 matches
Mail list logo
