On 02/09/2015 04:01 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I had to dro # in the error message, I am not quite sure what it means.
It just means more verbose.
Jason, what do you think?
Looks fine to me.
Jason
> Jan,
> This patch caused Bug 64982 - [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on
> x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32.
>Jack
Hi,
I think best way would be to move the warning to middle-end when the thunk is
being
expanded (other alternative is just to force analysis before doing t
Jan,
This patch caused Bug 64982 - [5 Regression] Many g++ failures on
x86_64-apple-darwin14 with -m32.
Jack
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch makes i386.c ready for presence of aliases of local functions, but
> also fixes a wrong code i
Hi,
this patch makes i386.c ready for presence of aliases of local functions, but
also fixes a wrong code issue where ix86_function_sseregparm
does use caller TARET_SSE_MATH flags instead of callees. If callee disagree
on this flag, it may get called with wrong calling convention.
I added error m
