On Thu, 19 May 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> type pair cache is compilation time hog just because of constant factors of
> our
> hashtable implementation as well as memory hog. This patch turns it into
> simple
> constantly sized hash with conflicts not handled (i.e. new pair kills the old
>
Hi,
type pair cache is compilation time hog just because of constant factors of our
hashtable implementation as well as memory hog. This patch turns it into simple
constantly sized hash with conflicts not handled (i.e. new pair kills the old
pair). This seems to remove pair cache overhead out of
