On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this patch is result of another pass through ipa-inline.c cleaning up
> confused and outdated comments.
>
> I also fixed accounting of growth caused by the small function inlining.
> We do not want to base it on program size before flatt
Hi,
this patch is result of another pass through ipa-inline.c cleaning up
confused and outdated comments.
I also fixed accounting of growth caused by the small function inlining.
We do not want to base it on program size before flattening, but afterwards.
Just like always inlines are not (and shou
