On 02/02/2017 06:49 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
it seems I forgot to send the updated patch. Here it is.
We now dump info like:
Checking profitability of path: 5 (16 insns) 3 (2 insns) 34 (2 insns) 33 (4
insns) 32 (1 insns) 10 (3 insns) 6
Control statement insns: 16
Overall: 12 insns
Regis
> > + if (!contains_hot_bb && speed_p && j < path_length - 1)
>
> j < path_length - 1 is already checked above?
>
> Otherwise looks ok. If it does fix the regression - does it?
Thanks, yes it fixes the regression.
Honza
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> it seems I forgot to send the updated patch. Here it is.
> We now dump info like:
> Checking profitability of path: 5 (16 insns) 3 (2 insns) 34 (2 insns) 33 (4
> insns) 32 (1 insns) 10 (3 insns) 6
> Control statement insns: 16
> Over
Hi,
it seems I forgot to send the updated patch. Here it is.
We now dump info like:
Checking profitability of path: 5 (16 insns) 3 (2 insns) 34 (2 insns) 33 (4
insns) 32 (1 insns) 10 (3 insns) 6
Control statement insns: 16
Overall: 12 insns
Registering FSM jump thread: (6, 10) incoming edge