> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> as Richard noticed in my port of the code to operand_equal_p, the checking
> >> of
> >> CONSTURCTOR in ipa-icf-gimple is incomplete missing the index checks.
> >> It i
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Hi,
>> as Richard noticed in my port of the code to operand_equal_p, the checking of
>> CONSTURCTOR in ipa-icf-gimple is incomplete missing the index checks.
>> It is also unnecesary si
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> as Richard noticed in my port of the code to operand_equal_p, the checking of
> CONSTURCTOR in ipa-icf-gimple is incomplete missing the index checks.
> It is also unnecesary since non-empty ctors does not happen as gimple
> operands. Thi
Hi,
as Richard noticed in my port of the code to operand_equal_p, the checking of
CONSTURCTOR in ipa-icf-gimple is incomplete missing the index checks.
It is also unnecesary since non-empty ctors does not happen as gimple
operands. This patch thus removes the unnecesary code.
Bootstrapped/regtest
