On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 5:33 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Even EXACT_DIV_EXPR doesn't distribute across addition for wrapping
> types, so in general we can't fold EXACT_DIV_EXPRs of POLY_INT_CSTs
> at compile time. This was causing an ICE when trying to gimplify the
> element size field in an A
Even EXACT_DIV_EXPR doesn't distribute across addition for wrapping
types, so in general we can't fold EXACT_DIV_EXPRs of POLY_INT_CSTs
at compile time. This was causing an ICE when trying to gimplify the
element size field in an ARRAY_REF.
If the result of that EXACT_DIV_EXPR is an invariant, we
