On 30/03/16 14:36, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> >You are only changing one place in this file.
>
>You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing now.
> >
> >The vectorizer already checks this (albeit indirectly):
> >
> > HOST_WID
On March 30, 2016 2:36:14 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Biener
wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
>> >
>> > You are only changing one place in this file.
>>
>> You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing
>now.
>> >
>> > The vectorizer already checks this (albei
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > - /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
>> > overlow may
>> > - not make the access valid later. */
>> > + /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
>> > overlow
>> > + m
> > - /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
> > overlow may
> > - not make the access valid later. */
> > + /* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that
> > overlow
> > + may not make the access valid later. */
> >if (!dominat
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> while looking into sudoku solving benchark, I noticed that we incorrectly
> estimate loop to iterate 10 times just because the array it traverses is of
> dimension 10. This of course is just upper bound and not realistic bound.
> Realist
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > You are only changing one place in this file.
>
> You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing now.
> >
> > The vectorizer already checks this (albeit indirectly):
> >
> > HOST_WIDE_INT max_niter
> > = max_stmt_exec
>
> You are only changing one place in this file.
You are right. I am attaching the updated patch which I am re-testing now.
>
> The vectorizer already checks this (albeit indirectly):
>
> HOST_WIDE_INT max_niter
> = max_stmt_executions_int (LOOP_VINFO_LOOP (loop_vinfo));
> if ((LOOP_VI
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> while looking into sudoku solving benchark, I noticed that we incorrectly
> estimate loop to iterate 10 times just because the array it traverses is of
> dimension 10. This of course is just upper bound and not realistic bound.
> Realistically those
Hi,
while looking into sudoku solving benchark, I noticed that we incorrectly
estimate loop to iterate 10 times just because the array it traverses is of
dimension 10. This of course is just upper bound and not realistic bound.
Realistically those loops iterates once most of time.
It turns out thi
