On 06/24/12 01:14, Xinliang David Li wrote:
thanks for the fix. It works fine for me.
Thanks. I have committed it.
thanks for the fix. It works fine for me.
David
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> This patch changes the coverage unlinking to be less aggressive. As David
> pointed out, when experimenting with random optimization options along side
> -fuse-coverage and -fra
This patch changes the coverage unlinking to be less aggressive. As David
pointed out, when experimenting with random optimization options along side
-fuse-coverage and -frandom-seed, it is inconvenient for gcc to remove the
coverage data file. The reason it was doing so, is because -frandom