On 07/31/15 04:43, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
I wonder if we shouldn't change:
TREE_TYPE (ctx->receiver_decl)
= build_qualified_type (build_reference_type (type), TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT);
in fixup_child_record_type to add:
if (is_gimple_omp_offloaded (ctx->stmt))
type = build_qualif
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> Const qualification of a pointer or reference doesn't result in any
>> >> optimization. The
>> >> decl you refer to has to be constant.
>> >
>> > Even if the pointer woul
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Const qualification of a pointer or reference doesn't result in any
> >> optimization. The
> >> decl you refer to has to be constant.
> >
> > Even if the pointer would be addressable?
>
> Yes, it's the decls readonly setting tha
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:22:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > I wonder if we shouldn't change:
>> >
>> > TREE_TYPE (ctx->receiver_decl)
>> > = build_qualif
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:22:30AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I wonder if we shouldn't change:
> >
> > TREE_TYPE (ctx->receiver_decl)
> > = build_qualified_type (build_reference_type (type),
> > TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT);
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if we shouldn't change:
>
> TREE_TYPE (ctx->receiver_decl)
> = build_qualified_type (build_reference_type (type), TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT);
>
> in fixup_child_record_type to add:
>
> if (is_gimple_omp_offloaded (ctx->stmt
Hi!
I wonder if we shouldn't change:
TREE_TYPE (ctx->receiver_decl)
= build_qualified_type (build_reference_type (type), TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT);
in fixup_child_record_type to add:
if (is_gimple_omp_offloaded (ctx->stmt))
type = build_qualified_type (type, TYPE_QUAL_CONST);
before it (
