On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> The shared files between gcc and binutils are way out of sync.
>
> Yeah I noticed, but didn't go for a full sync as that'd require
> testing other builds too. Thankfully your imported src commit
>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
> The shared files between gcc and binutils are way out of sync.
Yeah I noticed, but didn't go for a full sync as that'd require
testing other builds too. Thankfully your imported src commit
was local.
> I have synced binutils with gcc. I started submitting G
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> I tried the good old combined-tree approach (which some call
> ubertree), and was bitten by bfd not depending on zlib *in the
> gcc version of toplevel Makefile.in*. So, I did a partial sync
> to include the particular commit from the b
I tried the good old combined-tree approach (which some call
ubertree), and was bitten by bfd not depending on zlib *in the
gcc version of toplevel Makefile.in*. So, I did a partial sync
to include the particular commit from the binutils-gdb git and
committed as obvious after a auccessful build of
