Oleg Endo wrote:
> I'd like to add a test case for this.
>
> Attached patch was tested with
> make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp=pr55160.c --target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> OK to install?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
Quoting Oleg Endo :
I'm using:
/* { dg-skip-if "" { "sh*-*-*" } { "-m5*"} { "" } } */
Sorry, I mentally mixed up the arguments.
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 05:18 -0400, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Quoting Oleg Endo :
>
> > I'd like to add a test case for this.
> >
> > Attached patch was tested with
> > make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp=pr55160.c --target_board=sh-sim
> > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/
Quoting Oleg Endo :
I'd like to add a test case for this.
Attached patch was tested with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp=pr55160.c --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
OK to install?
That'll be for the SH maintainers to decide.
However,
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 02:31 -0400, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> gen_doloop_end_split creates a pattern that sets pc, hence emit_jump_insn
> has to be used instead of emit_insn.
>
> Committed as obvious.
I'd like to add a test case for this.
Attached patch was tested with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAG
gen_doloop_end_split creates a pattern that sets pc, hence emit_jump_insn
has to be used instead of emit_insn.
Committed as obvious.
2012-11-01 Joern Rennecke
PR target/55160
* config/sh/sh.md (doloop_end): Use emit_jump_insn.
Index: config/sh/sh.md
==
