nick clifton wrote:
> Hi Johann,
>> Hi, just out of curiosity: Is there a special reason to add a
>> stormy16-specific implementation instead of using the code in
>> libgcc2.c? t-avr for example uses the C implementation in libgcc2.c
>> for HI. Are there disadvantages?
>
> Apart from not using som
Hi Johann,
Hi, just out of curiosity: Is there a special reason to add a
stormy16-specific implementation instead of using the code in
libgcc2.c? t-avr for example uses the C implementation in libgcc2.c
for HI. Are there disadvantages?
Apart from not using some slightly frightening makefile mag
Nick Clifton schrieb:
Hi Guys,
I am checking in the patch below to add a __clrsbhi2 function to
libgcc for the XStormy16 port. This fixes several gcc testsuite
failures that need this particular function.
Cheers
Nick
Hi, just out of curiosity: Is there a special reason to add a
storm
Hi Guys,
I am checking in the patch below to add a __clrsbhi2 function to
libgcc for the XStormy16 port. This fixes several gcc testsuite
failures that need this particular function.
Cheers
Nick
libgcc/ChangeLog
2012-07-31 Nick Clifton
* config/stormy16/lib2funcs.c (__clrsbh
