On 7/19/25 23:26, Thomas Koenig wrote:
I wrote:
I have grave concerns.
At the last (to me an Nicolas) known state, before he was ousted
from the project, there were known race conditions, which can
cause freezing and/or data corruption.
I believe these have not been addressed, neither tested
On 7/19/25 2:26 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
I wrote:
I have grave concerns.
At the last (to me an Nicolas) known state, before he was ousted
from the project, there were known race conditions, which can
cause freezing and/or data corruption.
I believe these have not been addressed, neither teste
I wrote:
I have grave concerns.
At the last (to me an Nicolas) known state, before he was ousted
from the project, there were known race conditions, which can
cause freezing and/or data corruption.
I believe these have not been addressed, neither tested nor by
inspection.
Maybe a word of exp
On 7/19/25 10:59 AM, Toon Moene wrote:
On 7/19/25 18:32, Jerry D wrote:
I expanded on Toon's random_weather.f90 test using:
!integer, parameter :: DNX = 72, DNY = 70, DNZ = 30, BDSIZE = 4, HORSTEP =
1, VERSTEP = 100, FCLEN = 3600, TIMSTEP = 240
integer, parameter :: DNX = 1000, DNY =
On 7/19/25 18:32, Jerry D wrote:
I expanded on Toon's random_weather.f90 test using:
!integer, parameter :: DNX = 72, DNY = 70, DNZ = 30, BDSIZE = 4, HORSTEP =
1, VERSTEP = 100, FCLEN = 3600, TIMSTEP = 240
integer, parameter :: DNX = 1000, DNY = 1500, DNZ = 100, BDSIZE = 4,
HORSTEP =
On 7/17/25 9:37 PM, Jerry D wrote:
I have created a new gfortran-test branch on gcc here.
origin/devel/gfortran-test
This has the patches applied as needed to do the testing I have done.
When Andre's patches are approved I will revert and rebase this so we can test
the next set of major chang
