On 9/12/12, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:03:39 -0700
>> From: Ian Lance Taylor
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Lawrence Crowl
>> wrote:
>> > On 9/11/12, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >> Mark Kettenis writes:
>> >>> In file included from ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c:47:0:
>
> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:03:39 -0700
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > On 9/11/12, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Mark Kettenis writes:
> >>> In file included from ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c:47:0:
> >>> ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c: In functio
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 9/11/12, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Mark Kettenis writes:
>>> In file included from ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c:47:0:
>>> ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c: In function 'void dump_fixup_edge(FILE*,
>>> fixup_graph_type*, fixup_edge_p)':
>>> ../..
On 9/11/12, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Mark Kettenis writes:
>> In file included from ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c:47:0:
>> ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c: In function 'void dump_fixup_edge(FILE*,
>> fixup_graph_type*, fixup_edge_p)':
>> ../../../src/gcc/gcc/system.h:288:78: error: integer overflow in
>>
Mark Kettenis writes:
> In file included from ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c:47:0:
> ../../../src/gcc/gcc/mcf.c: In function 'void dump_fixup_edge(FILE*,
> fixup_graph_type*, fixup_edge_p)':
> ../../../src/gcc/gcc/system.h:288:78: error: integer overflow in expression
> [-Werror=overflow]
This is
> Index: gcc/ChangeLog
>
> 2012-09-04 Lawrence Crowl
>
> * double-int.h (double_int::operator &=): New.
> (double_int::operator ^=): New.
> (double_int::operator |=): New.
> (double_int::mul_with_sign): Modify overflow parameter to bool*.
> (do
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 9/5/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> >> Modify gcc/*.[hc] double_int call sites to use the new interface.
> >> This change entailed adding a few new methods to double_int.
> >>
> >> Other changes will happen
On 9/5/12, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> On 9/5/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> The tmin.cmp (tmax, uns) > 0 kind of things look odd - definitely
>>> methods like tmin.gt (tmax, uns) would be nice to have. Or even
>>> better, get rid of the 'uns' parameters an
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
On 9/5/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
The tmin.cmp (tmax, uns) > 0 kind of things look odd - definitely
methods like tmin.gt (tmax, uns) would be nice to have. Or even
better, get rid of the 'uns' parameters and provide a
struct double_int_with_signedne
On 9/5/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> Modify gcc/*.[hc] double_int call sites to use the new interface.
>> This change entailed adding a few new methods to double_int.
>>
>> Other changes will happen in separate patches. Once all uses of
>> the old inte
10 matches
Mail list logo