On 05/25/2011 01:45 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure where you're looking for added documentation for this
>> patch.
>
> I guess no surprise that'd be md.texi node Defining Attributes,
That covers define_attr, not set_attr, so it seems i
On Wed, 25 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I'm not sure where you're looking for added documentation for this
> patch.
I guess no surprise that'd be md.texi node Defining Attributes,
or an updated example in node Attr Example since the
documentation for "default" basically just refers to it. Or
On 05/25/2011 08:56 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I've found it useful to use a construct such as the following:
>>
>> (define_attr "units64"
>> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
>> (const_string "unknown"))
>>
>> (define_attr "units64p"
>>
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I've found it useful to use a construct such as the following:
>
> (define_attr "units64"
> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
> (const_string "unknown"))
>
> (define_attr "units64p"
> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
> (attr "units64"))
On 05/10/2011 03:47 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I've found it useful to use a construct such as the following:
>
> (define_attr "units64"
> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
> (const_string "unknown"))
>
> (define_attr "units64p"
> "unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
> (attr "units64
I've found it useful to use a construct such as the following:
(define_attr "units64"
"unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
(const_string "unknown"))
(define_attr "units64p"
"unknown,d,d_addr,l,m,s,dl,ds,dls,ls"
(attr "units64"))
to define one attribute in terms of another by default, al
