On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:55:02AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> OK.
Thanks.
> BTW, you may also want to consider warning for integer types with a
> precision of 1 bit.
Yup, this is being tracked in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49706#c2
I suppose I'll get back to that in this stage1.
On 04/30/2015 07:17 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
The problem here was that the -Wbool-compare warning about always false/true
comparisons with 0/1 was assuming that both operands are of a boolean type.
That was wrong so check for that, but don't get confused about bools promoted
to int.
This bug is
The problem here was that the -Wbool-compare warning about always false/true
comparisons with 0/1 was assuming that both operands are of a boolean type.
That was wrong so check for that, but don't get confused about bools promoted
to int.
This bug is blocking aarch64 bootstrap, so I'm taking the l
