On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:36:18PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> This still doesn't fix the tests.
Sure, one needs to add the constexpr virtual calls for ia64 as I said in the
mail.
Jakub
On Sep 20 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> --- gcc/cp/class.c.jj 2018-09-20 09:56:59.229751895 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/class.c2018-09-20 10:12:17.447370890 +0200
> @@ -9266,7 +9266,6 @@ build_vtbl_initializer (tree binfo,
>tree vcall_index;
>tree fn, fn_original;
>tree init = N
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 07:08:41PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This patch is OK. And your suggestion for cxx_eval_call_expression
> > sounds right, too. Marek, will you follow up on that?
>
> Ok, I will (provided I can get a box that has TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESCRIPTORS,
> I
> think ppc64 BE
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018, 7:08 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:15:46AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > >> On Sep 19 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:15:46AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> On Sep 19 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>
> >> > Andreas, do the new testcases pass? That would surprise
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Sep 19 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> > Andreas, do the new testcases pass? That would surprise me, but OK if so.
>>
>> No, they don't.
>>
>> /usr/local/gcc/gcc-2018092
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Sep 19 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > Andreas, do the new testcases pass? That would surprise me, but OK if so.
>
> No, they don't.
>
> /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:29:26:
> e
On Sep 19 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Andreas, do the new testcases pass? That would surprise me, but OK if so.
No, they don't.
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-virtual2.C:29:26:
error: non-constant condition for static assertion
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180920/gc
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:07:34PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Sep 19 2018, Marek Polacek wrote:
>>
>> > 2018-09-19 Marek Polacek
>> >
>> > * class.c (build_vtbl_initializer): Don't mess with *inits for
>> > TARGET_VTABLE_
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:07:34PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Sep 19 2018, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > 2018-09-19 Marek Polacek
> >
> > * class.c (build_vtbl_initializer): Don't mess with *inits for
> > TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESCRIPTORS.
> >
> > diff --git gcc/cp/class.c gcc/cp/clas
On Sep 19 2018, Marek Polacek wrote:
> 2018-09-19 Marek Polacek
>
> * class.c (build_vtbl_initializer): Don't mess with *inits for
> TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESCRIPTORS.
>
> diff --git gcc/cp/class.c gcc/cp/class.c
> index 9ca46441871..0239f6ae045 100644
> --- gcc/cp/class.c
> +++ gcc/c
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 03:25:02PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I'm getting this ICE on ia64:
>
> libtool: compile: /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/./gcc/xgcc
> -shared-libgcc -B/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/./gcc -nostdinc++
> -L/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/ia64-suse-linux/libstdc
I'm getting this ICE on ia64:
libtool: compile: /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20180919/Build/ia64-suse-linux/libstdc++-v
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:29:16PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/class.c
> > +++ gcc/cp/class.c
> > @@ -9266,6 +9266,7 @@ build_vtbl_initializer (tree binfo,
> >tree vcall_index;
> >tree fn, fn_original;
> >tree init = NULL_TREE;
> > + tree idx = build_int_
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:28:06PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:45:22PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:30:46PM -0400, Jaso
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:28:06PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:45:22PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:30:46PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Mare
16 matches
Mail list logo
