Jason Merrill writes:
> On 06/01/2015 11:34 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Isn't this about global vs. std namespace?
>
> Probably. Does making the declaration in the testcase extern "C" help?
It does indeed, and the test still passes on Linux.
Rainer
--
--
On 06/01/2015 11:34 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Isn't this about global vs. std namespace?
Probably. Does making the declaration in the testcase extern "C" help?
Jason
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 06/01/2015 08:13 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Jason Merrill writes:
>>
>>> -pedantic shouldn't change something from OK into an error, but it was
>>> doing so for redeclaration of a declaration from a system header with a
>>> mismatched exception specification. And wheth
On 06/01/2015 08:13 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jason Merrill writes:
-pedantic shouldn't change something from OK into an error, but it was
doing so for redeclaration of a declaration from a system header with a
mismatched exception specification. And whether we are strict about things
in system
Jason Merrill writes:
> -pedantic shouldn't change something from OK into an error, but it was
> doing so for redeclaration of a declaration from a system header with a
> mismatched exception specification. And whether we are strict about things
> in system headers should be controlled by -Wsyst
-pedantic shouldn't change something from OK into an error, but it was
doing so for redeclaration of a declaration from a system header with a
mismatched exception specification. And whether we are strict about
things in system headers should be controlled by -Wsystem-headers.
Tested x86_64-p
