OK.
Jason
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:57:30AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 07:35 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >+ permerror (type_start_token->location,
> >+ "extra qualification not allowed");
> >+ type = error_mark_node;
>
> If we're using permerror, we sho
On 04/21/2016 07:35 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ permerror (type_start_token->location,
+"extra qualification not allowed");
+ type = error_mark_node;
If we're using permerror, we shouldn't set type to error_mark_node; if
we do that, -fpermissive w
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:33:55AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 07:51 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >By the template part of this PR I mean that we ICE on
> >
> >template
> >class D
> >{
> > enum D::A { foo } c;
> >};
> >
> >where clang++ says
> >error: template specialization or def
On 04/08/2016 07:51 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This is my attempt to fix at least a part of this PR. I haven't been able to
come up with a fix that fixes the other part involving templates.
We were ICEing on code such as
struct S
{
enum E : int;
enum S::E : int { foo } e;
};
Clang rejects
Ping.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:51:02PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This is my attempt to fix at least a part of this PR. I haven't been able to
> come up with a fix that fixes the other part involving templates.
>
> We were ICEing on code such as
>
> struct S
> {
> enum E : int;
> enum
This is my attempt to fix at least a part of this PR. I haven't been able to
come up with a fix that fixes the other part involving templates.
We were ICEing on code such as
struct S
{
enum E : int;
enum S::E : int { foo } e;
};
Clang rejects this with "extra qualification" error. When I m
