On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:09:58PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Marek Polace
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:09:58PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Ja
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:09:58PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jason Merrill
Ping. Any ideas how to move this forward?
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 05:22:00PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:09:58PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:09:58PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Marek Polace
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> >> In this testcase we have
>> >> C c = bar (X{1});
>> >>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:34:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> In this testcase we have
> >> C c = bar (X{1});
> >> which store_init_value sees as
> >> c = TARGET_EXPR >> .n=(&)
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> In this testcase we have
>> C c = bar (X{1});
>> which store_init_value sees as
>> c = TARGET_EXPR > .n=(&)->i}>)>
>> i.e. we're initializing "c" with a TARGET_EXPR. We call replace_p
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In this testcase we have
> C c = bar (X{1});
> which store_init_value sees as
> c = TARGET_EXPR .n=(&)->i}>)>
> i.e. we're initializing "c" with a TARGET_EXPR. We call replace_placeholders
> that walks the whole tree to substitute the place
Ping.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:10:48PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In this testcase we have
> C c = bar (X{1});
> which store_init_value sees as
> c = TARGET_EXPR .n=(&)->i}>)>
> i.e. we're initializing "c" with a TARGET_EXPR. We call replace_placeholders
> that walks the whole tree to subst
In this testcase we have
C c = bar (X{1});
which store_init_value sees as
c = TARGET_EXPR )->i}>)>
i.e. we're initializing "c" with a TARGET_EXPR. We call replace_placeholders
that walks the whole tree to substitute the placeholders. Eventually we find
the nested but that's for another object, s
11 matches
Mail list logo