On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 03:56:40PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:26 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > This valid test started to be accepted with r265789, which removed the
> > following checks.
>
> It didn't remove them, it moved them into invalid_tparm_referent_p.
> And
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:26 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> This valid test started to be accepted with r265789, which removed the
> following checks.
It didn't remove them, it moved them into invalid_tparm_referent_p.
And changed the tests for C++17.
> I wonder if we want to remove them in gcc 8,
This valid test started to be accepted with r265789, which removed the
following checks. I wonder if we want to remove them in gcc 8, or
just leave them in place. For trunk I'm going to add the new test.
@@ -6985,27 +7071,10 @@ convert_nontype_argument (tree type, tree expr,
tsubst_flags_t comp
