On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:45:10PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> Someone on IRC complained that there was no way to suppress -Wunused
>> on structured bindings. It seemed to me that the way the feature
>> works, we shouldn't warn about the
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:45:10PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Someone on IRC complained that there was no way to suppress -Wunused
> on structured bindings. It seemed to me that the way the feature
> works, we shouldn't warn about the bindings individually; users need
> to give each of the subo
Someone on IRC complained that there was no way to suppress -Wunused
on structured bindings. It seemed to me that the way the feature
works, we shouldn't warn about the bindings individually; users need
to give each of the subobjects a name even if they're only interested
in using one of them.
So