Re: C++ PATCH for decomp31.C test

2018-10-12 Thread Marek Polacek
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:59:00AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:10 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:39:51PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > Running make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=decomp31.C will yield > > > # of unsupported tests

Re: C++ PATCH for decomp31.C test

2018-10-12 Thread Jason Merrill
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 4:10 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:39:51PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > > Running make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=decomp31.C will yield > > # of unsupported tests3 > > because the test (as the only one in cpp1z/) uses > > "dg-do

Re: C++ PATCH for decomp31.C test

2018-10-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:39:51PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > Running make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=decomp31.C will yield > # of unsupported tests3 > because the test (as the only one in cpp1z/) uses > "dg-do compile { target c++17 }" which doesn't work (yet?). This patch >

C++ PATCH for decomp31.C test

2018-10-11 Thread Marek Polacek
Running make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=decomp31.C will yield # of unsupported tests 3 because the test (as the only one in cpp1z/) uses "dg-do compile { target c++17 }" which doesn't work (yet?). This patch makes it use explicit dg-options as in other tests, so now we get # of expecte