On Apr 08 2019, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Thanks, committed. Andreas -- I hope the failure is fixed now.
Yes, all tests of aggr-base[89].C are passing.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for som
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 03:24:13PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/1/19 11:23 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > On Mär 28 2019, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andreas, could you please find out why we're not hitting this code
On 4/1/19 11:23 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Mär 28 2019, Marek Polacek wrote:
Andreas, could you please find out why we're not hitting this code in
digest_init_r:
1210 tree elt = CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (stripped_init, 0)->value;
Any comments?
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:23:29AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > On Mär 28 2019, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > > Andreas, could you please find out why we're not hitting this code in
> > > digest_init_r:
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mär 28 2019, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > Andreas, could you please find out why we're not hitting this code in
> > digest_init_r:
> >
> > 1210 tree elt = CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (stripped_init, 0)->value;
> > 1211 if (referen
On Mär 28 2019, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Andreas, could you please find out why we're not hitting this code in
> digest_init_r:
>
> 1210 tree elt = CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (stripped_init, 0)->value;
> 1211 if (reference_related_p (type, TREE_TYPE (elt)))
This is never executed if flag_checking
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 01:30:46PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/26/19 11:06 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > I don't see any of the warnings in the tests on ia64.
> > >
> > > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test
On 3/26/19 11:06 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
I don't see any of the warnings in the tests on ia64.
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnings, line 33)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnin
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I don't see any of the warnings in the tests on ia64.
>
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnings, line 33)
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnings, line 34)
> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/agg
I don't see any of the warnings in the tests on ia64.
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnings, line 33)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnings, line 34)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aggr-base8.C -std=c++17 (test for warnings, line 35)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/agg
On 3/25/19 12:02 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:20:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/22/19 4:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/22/19 2:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
+ B b10 = {{B{42}}};
+ B b11 = {{B{{42}
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:20:43PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/22/19 4:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 3/22/19 2:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > > > > + B b10 = {{B{42}}};
> > > > > > + B b11 = {{B{{42;
> >
On 3/22/19 4:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/22/19 2:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
+ B b10 = {{B{42}}};
+ B b11 = {{B{{42;
+ B b12 = {{B{{{42};
These look ill-formed to me: too many braces around the B value.
Looks li
On 3/22/19 2:14 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
+ B b10 = {{B{42}}};
+ B b11 = {{B{{42;
+ B b12 = {{B{{{42};
These look ill-formed to me: too many braces around the B value.
Looks like the original testcase had the same prob
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:48:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/21/19 4:51 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This is a crash in digest_init_r -- we encounter
> >
> >/* "If T is a class type and the initializer list has a single
> > element of type cv U, where U is T or a class derived f
On 3/21/19 4:51 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This is a crash in digest_init_r -- we encounter
/* "If T is a class type and the initializer list has a single
element of type cv U, where U is T or a class derived from T,
the object is initialized from that element." */
if (flag_chec
This is a crash in digest_init_r -- we encounter
/* "If T is a class type and the initializer list has a single
element of type cv U, where U is T or a class derived from T,
the object is initialized from that element." */
if (flag_checking
&& cxx_dialect >= cxx11
&& BRA
17 matches
Mail list logo
