On 4/11/19 5:36 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch deals with constexpr functions and whether or not they should be
noexcept.
CWG 1129 specified that constexpr functions are noexcept: it was a special case
in [expr.unary.noexcept]. This was accidentally removed in
but the CWG conclusion was t
On 11/04/19 17:36 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch deals with constexpr functions and whether or not they should be
noexcept.
CWG 1129 specified that constexpr functions are noexcept: it was a special case
in [expr.unary.noexcept]. This was accidentally removed in
but the CWG conclusion
This patch deals with constexpr functions and whether or not they should be
noexcept.
CWG 1129 specified that constexpr functions are noexcept: it was a special case
in [expr.unary.noexcept]. This was accidentally removed in
but the CWG conclusion was to keep it as-is.
Clearly we need to change
