On 09/19/2018 10:02 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:51:44AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/18/2018 09:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As I mentioned in the PR, [class.conv.fct] says "A conversion function is never
used to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possib
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> As I mentioned in the PR, [class.conv.fct] says "A conversion function is
> never
> used to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly
> cv-qualified)
> same object type (or a reference to it), to a (possibly cv-qualified) b
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 09:51:44AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 09/18/2018 09:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > As I mentioned in the PR, [class.conv.fct] says "A conversion function is
> > never
> > used to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly
> > cv-qualified)
> > same obj
On 09/18/2018 09:47 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As I mentioned in the PR, [class.conv.fct] says "A conversion function is never
used to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly cv-qualified)
same object type (or a reference to it), to a (possibly cv-qualified) base class
of that typ
As I mentioned in the PR, [class.conv.fct] says "A conversion function is never
used to convert a (possibly cv-qualified) object to the (possibly cv-qualified)
same object type (or a reference to it), to a (possibly cv-qualified) base class
of that type (or a reference to it), or to (possibly cv-qu
