On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:59:00PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 03:00:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Marek Polacek
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:59:00PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 03:00:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> > We crash on this testcase containing a bogus
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 03:00:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > We crash on this testcase containing a bogus attribute, because
>> > cp_check_const_attributes accessed TREE_VALUE o
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 03:00:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > We crash on this testcase containing a bogus attribute, because
> > cp_check_const_attributes accessed TREE_VALUE of a tree that happened to be
> > expr_pack_expansion. Since
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> We crash on this testcase containing a bogus attribute, because
> cp_check_const_attributes accessed TREE_VALUE of a tree that happened to be
> expr_pack_expansion. Since here we're merely trying to evaluate constexpr
> arguments, I thought w
We crash on this testcase containing a bogus attribute, because
cp_check_const_attributes accessed TREE_VALUE of a tree that happened to be
expr_pack_expansion. Since here we're merely trying to evaluate constexpr
arguments, I thought we could skip such bogus arguments.
Bootstrapped/regtested on
