On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 02:10:51PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Now that we're doing normal handling of qualified names in a template,
> we need to handle the case of an unresolved enumerator name.
>
> Jakub, should this also go into 8.1?
It is certainly ok for 8.2, for 8.1 I'll discuss tomorrow
Now that we're doing normal handling of qualified names in a template,
we need to handle the case of an unresolved enumerator name.
Jakub, should this also go into 8.1?
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit f7dae5dc1933f836e47cafeab2ff2bd5d80e4eeb
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Tu
