On 12 September 2014 17:41, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 02:06 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>>
>> I'd expect you want to remove the dg-bogus directives from the test,
>> and the "// odd diagnostic" comment too?
> They aren't necessary, but they give information about former bugs that the
>
On 09/12/2014 02:06 AM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
I'd expect you want to remove the dg-bogus directives from the test,
and the "// odd diagnostic" comment too?
They aren't necessary, but they give information about former bugs that
the test found, so I'm inclined to leave them in.
Jason
On 12 September 2014 05:05, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Basically all we need to do here is accept it, like check_classfn; all the
> necessary checking was already done in check_explicit_specialization.
>
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
I'd expect you want to remove the dg-bogus direc
Basically all we need to do here is accept it, like check_classfn; all
the necessary checking was already done in check_explicit_specialization.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit f0ef26fb06fe5798cd7bb071a932a21cf5e5a878
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu Sep 11 16:45:47 2014
