On 08/01/2014 08:51 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
...and for array initialization as well.
Small tweak: we don't need to mess with empty_list if we don't have any
trailing elements to initialize.
commit 44aef29c18bfd087d9b7bd72699bad9c72e272fb
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed Aug 6 15:22:44 20
On 03/04/2014 05:14 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
In C++11, copy-list-initialization by explicit constructor is an error,
even for the default constructor. But this combined with the change of
aggregate initialization to use {} for any missing initializers means
that well-formed C++03 code becomes il
In C++11, copy-list-initialization by explicit constructor is an error,
even for the default constructor. But this combined with the change of
aggregate initialization to use {} for any missing initializers means
that well-formed C++03 code becomes ill-formed in C++11. Until the
committee dec
