On 05/30/2012 10:44 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The code in build_new_1 already knows how to handle an initializer that
it was unable to stabilize, but the logic was backwards in a critical
place. I'm surprised this typo hasn't been hit before since it was
introduced in 2006...
...and then this pa
The code in build_new_1 already knows how to handle an initializer that
it was unable to stabilize, but the logic was backwards in a critical
place. I'm surprised this typo hasn't been hit before since it was
introduced in 2006...
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.7.
commit
