On 3 July 2013 22:42, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 11:24 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>>
>> Finally, should we put a line for thins in the 4.9 changes page?
>>
>>
> PING! Is adding links to the C++2014 library page OK?
>From http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html? Yes, that's OK, the
s
On 06/27/2013 11:24 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/27/2013 07:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
Ex
On 06/27/2013 07:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
Excellent, thanks!
Tested with xmllint. Are the
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 25 June 2013 16:45, <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
>>
>> Excellent, thanks!
>>
>>> Tested with xmllint. Are there any other tests I shoul
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, <3dw...@verizon.net> wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
Excellent, thanks!
Tested with xmllint. Are there any other tests I should do?
The makefile target to check the docbook manual is:
make doc-xm
